Sex, Lies And Videotape: Liar, An Evaluation Of Series One And Where The Show Can Go From Here

Given the raw issues at the heart of Liar, whatever route the show followed, whatever conclusion it landed upon, it was always going to be divisive to some. You can’t please all the people especially when a section of the public still, as the credits rolled, believed Andrew Earlham could still be proved innocent. On the very day the ‘Me Too’ hashtag (a way for women to communicate they’d been victims of sexual abuse and harassment) was storming Twitter, the grim reality of Liar’s message could not have been laid more bare. The scale of a societal problem mostly unspoken covered unsuspecting timelines and with Liar, issues not usually given such public attention flickered out of eight million televisions and laptops.

Did it convey the message it was trying to get across well enough? Mostly, yes. It covered the issue of victims living in fear and embarrassment for the actions of someone else, and showed they blamed themselves partly because the legal system and general public perceptions put those doubts into them.  It showed a limp justice system that was yet another barrier to women coming forward. There has been the argument that the women in Liar were all weak but being battered by a system designed to keep their voices unheard means they’re more tired than weak. Yes, they could all have organised together, spoke up as one and put Andrew away but this is television. While it would be a satisfactory ending of sorts, it wouldn’t be an exciting one. They must have wanted Laura to stand on her own as a main character, to be the odd one out and the one that stood up to her oppressor. They referenced her stubbornness and failure to back down a few times as Andrew himself told her “you’re different”. In a her versus him scenario, and that is what the series was set up as, it makes perfect sense that Laura challenged him as an individual, even when friends and family were telling her to move on.

Just one look through the Twitter comments on Liar suggests there are many who didn’t understand these simple messages. They didn’t trust Laura despite all the evidence staring everyone in the face because she wasn’t a very likeable character. To an extent she wasn’t very endearing but that doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be sympathy for what she was going through. At the other end of the scale, Andrew’s charm was always enough to convince some of his innocence despite being shown drugging his targets and filming his crimes. What show are these people watching?! It’s the personification of rape culture and exactly why women stay silent. It’s why Earlham’s past victims never came forward in the first place. If you voiced total disregard for Laura’s plight and sympathised with the attacker you are contributing to rape culture. You are building further barriers for truth to break through.

Liar was by no means perfect. The heightened reality element of the break ins  and abductions maybe took away from the ultimate message but to wait six episodes to reveal the culprit would have tiresome so the show needed to go in different directions. On the surface, secondary story lines involving cheating exes and sisters felt a little incidental to the series and in a way they were – to series one. Without us even knowing the writers were expertly plotting the arc for the second run right under our noses. They’ve built up an impressive list of potential murderers while we were preoccupied with bringing Andrew Earlham to justice. The candidates are:

• Laura: After fighting so hard for justice it would seem hard to believe she’d take the law THIS far into her own hands. But she might have been pushed to far by a failed third attempt to get him locked up.
• Katy: Could she have killed Andrew as a perverse way of getting back in her sister’s good books? She’s lost her sibling and her fella so might feel she doesn’t have much to lose.
• Tom: Hates Andrew for being partly responsible for losing his job, hates Andrew for raping Laura (fair enough on that one) and clearly one who doesn’t like playing by the rules. A big contender.
• Luke: Luke had become increasingly frustrated by his dad and looked sketchy as hell when the cops showed up. Does he resent being an alibi in the Laura case and most of all, does he blame Andrew for his mum’s death. Now he really does have an alibi.
• “G.I Jennifer”: She certainly has the skills to dispatch a man’s body somewhere and her hatred for what he did to Vanessa is clearing tearing her up.
• Vanessa: Unlikely as she plays so by the rulebook as a cop. The same can be said for colleague Rory.
• Ian: Why not? His relationship with Laura may be blossoming and seeing effects of the trauma Andrew had on her might trigger an inner madman.
• Mia: Did she know what was in the shed all along? Does that shed also contain suitable murder equipment?
• Or maybe more than one person? A joining of forces? Mix any of the above.

It can be long debated about whether the murder of a rapist is a satisfactory ending but it has certainly been a big talking point. Many have stated how Liar bears no similarities whatsoever to Broadchurch but everything from it’s seaside set Nordic Noir style to the plots prove the comparisons are more than worthy. It’s just doing things the other way round. A rape case in series one rather than the third, a murder whodunnit in the second rather than the first. By all accounts the next run of Liar will be the last which at least slims the chances of iffy courtroom nonsense. In switching the default setting let’s hope Liar doesn’t lose sense of all the important issues it has tried and sometimes succeeded in getting across. It’s a big ask and even even bigger wait as the eta is late 2019. Does it need a second series? Absolutely not. Will the country be watching? Almost certainly.

Jessica Jones: A Tribute To Its Marvel

NEW YORK, NY – MARCH 10: Krysten Ritter filming “Jessica Jones” on March 10, 2015 in New York City. (Photo by Steve Sands/GC Images)

 

Contains spoilers for Jessica Jones, series 1

 

I’ll be honest with you from the off. I have no interest in comic books or superhero films. On a level from 0 to Sheldon I am doing the washing up while my flatmate watches The Big Bang Theory. I am a geek, just not about this kind of stuff. What Superhero blockbusters I have seen tend to be trite and predictable powerpoint presentations in CGI.

On Saturday I signed up to Netflix and thought I’d give Jessica Jones a go as I’d heard some good things. By Tuesday I’d completed all 13 episodes. Now I realise some people watch these shows all in the same day but for me, a series in four days is as binge watchy as I can get. Despite not knowing a thing about Hell’s Kitchen (other than the fact that Gordon Ramsay probably visits) or the history of anyone involved, the show captivated me. I was dragged willingly into its claustrophobic world. Here are the magnificent seven reasons why I think Jessica Jones is the best TV show I’ve seen in years.

 

1: The theme tune

Seriously. It’s awesome. Especially when it kicks in.

 

2: The “strong” female characters and coverage of abusive relationships

The term “strong female characters” is loathed by yours truly. It’s as misleading as it unhelpful. The intention, when used in commonplace is that women can kick arse and have strong opinions. Which is great, of course it is. However the portrayal of this tends to end up with single minded, cold women. Sometimes in a latex uniform or push up bra. For me, the issue is that their characterisation should be more layered, more multi faceted. That makes for a great character whether they are a woman or not. Too many times the female is someone’s boyfriend/husband or a plot device. Step forward Jessica Jones…

Yes, Jessica is opinionated and she kicks arse. Let’s make no bones about that. She does it in a pair of jeans and leather jacket. No fluttering of her eyelashes, no swishing her hair and no flesh revealed. Her dry sarcasm and cynical one liners are a joy. Here’s the main thing – She’s also totally flawed and very complex. There’s a barrier up between her and the world, even the people closest to her but she is pure of heart. Her determination to do the right thing by others is what drives her through the series (not Season, I’m British, sorry!). You can see those defences weaken, as well as her bed, to Luke Cage because she wants to be able to love. She’s grown to dislike who she has become and is striving for change. She is haunted by the abuse of the past but she is not defined by it. That’s a key thing here. While she is a victim, she does not play the victim. The same can be said of Trish Walker.

Which brings us on to the depictions of abuse shown. For Jessica it is both mental and sexual. Her tormentor Kilgrave has the gift of mind control. A skill that he uses to command people for information he requires or to kill themselves at his will. Or both. For Jessica, his motives were different. He trapped her in his forcefield and forced her into a relationship with no consent of her own. It must be noted that it is wonderful that they didn’t resort to a flashback of rape. It’s absence almost making it more powerful. It’s the subtlety in such things that is part of the show’s strength.

Kilgrave has many excuses for his past behaviour. That she was a willing participent, was taken to great restaurants, given a great life and so on. This acts as a perfect mirror to real life situations. His powers are not important when it comes to his own mind and the worrying thing is that he doesn’t feel he’s done wrong, he doesn’t believe he’s an abuser. He almost believes his own lies and that even makes modern day Jessica doubt the past and makes her analyse her own behaviour. Was she really to blame afterall? Had she got it wrong? Now how’s that for some spectacular social commentary? Just because Kilgrave is in love with Jessica, and he clearly is, doesn’t make his behaviour valid. With or without his gift, his form of love is power and control.

The abuse Trish recieved in her youth was from her own mother. We do not learn about this too early on. From the outside she is simply a successful and independant person but we discover about her past later. The hindsight layers more depths to her achievements. Again, she is not a victim. Her handling of things is different. She is more in contol of her emotions than her friend, but her mind is probably just as caged as the high security flat she lives in. Outwardly, Jessica is emotionally guarded and physically strong but has a flat that anybody can get into. Trish’s exterior is confident and friendly but her flat is set up like a prison. Work out what you want to from that..

The show’s take on such abuse is subtle but very vivid. For such a mainstream series to talk of rape and its consequences is a stroke of genuis. For it to call out all the myths? That is very important. It is brave storytelling.

 

3: The superpowers are not too super

Jessica can kick the shit out of people and lift heavy things. She can also jump a bit higher and longer than standard humans though insists its not flying. That’s it. No major talent to get out of really difficult situations or to wrap up any knot the writers have tied themselves in. As such it plays out much more as a psychological thriller than a superhero story.

As for Kilgrave, the biggest delight about his evil is that it’s not used for any of that take over the world nonsense. He gets information from people and if in a bad mood, tells them to do dome horrific things in an either hilarious or gruesome way. For him, Jessica is his world that he wants to conquer. It’s highly unlikely he’d be arsed with trying to rule the planet. While there may be certain understandable get out clauses to his power (it only last twelve hours for example) his use of it is purely selfish and mostly in the moment.

 

4: Kilgrave:

He is an utter bastard and Tennant plays him with relish. When he’s smiling and dishing out the insults we aren’t even reluctant to laugh despite the fact he’s clearly a despicable cretin.  Then when he’s cold and calculated, we want to throw him off a building. He’s a masterful enemy that will go down in TV legend. But, just so we’re clear,  still an absolute cunt. Well played David, well played.

 

5 : The interwoven storylines

There are many intricate details and events running through the series that tie in with eachother perfectly, even when they feel like unnecessary tangents.  Spoilers follow but there is a hell of a lot going on:

• Malcom’s drug habit
• Robyn and Ruben’s somewhat odd sibling set up
• Holgarth’s relationship issues
• Luke’s “gift” and past
• Hope’s legal case.
• The Kilgrave help group
• Will’s.. issues.

All told with deph without taking away from the main story and ultimately, satisfyingly being very important to the main arc. BRAVO

 

6: The action scenes:

Any plasterers in Hell’s Kitchen will have employment for life. Many bodies are thrown into and pulled through walls. Lots of furniture is destroyed or contorted in anger. The action is intense and consuming. Neither is the show afraid of gore. Bodies are burned, cuts are slashed, guns are fired. It is not afraid of blood or.. er.. dismembered bodies.

 

7: The cinematography:

It has a very dark, unsettling feel. Plenty of narrow corridors and dingy streets. The main highlight for me was our first proper introduction to the malice in Kilgrave’s powers as he enters the house of a family of stangers. We follow him around with one long tracking shot as he barks his orders. “Get in the cupboard” he orders the kids and they do as he says. We never actually see him properly through the whole thing and it is left on a lingering close up of the knife he’s polishing. It serves as a metaphor for Jessica’s mind – his effect, even when out of sight is strong.

 

So, go ahead, watch it. I command you. If you ignore me then you’ve already looked at the picture below and will do so under Kilgrave’s orders anyway. You know it makes sense.